A randomized, double-blinded Phase 3 study to demonstrate lot-to-lot consistency and to confirm immunogenicity and safety of the live-attenuated chikungunya virus vaccine candidate VLA1553 in healthy adults†.

BACKGROUND: The global spread of the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) increases the exposure risk for individuals travelling to or living in endemic areas. This Phase 3 study was designed to demonstrate manufacturing consistency between three lots of the single shot live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine VLA1553, and to confirm the promising immunogenicity and safety data obtained in previous trials. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, lot-to-lot consistency, Phase 3 study, assessed immunogenicity and safety of VLA1553 in 408 healthy adults (18-45 years) in 12 sites across the USA. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios of CHIKV-specific neutralizing antibodies between three VLA1553 lots at 28 days post-vaccination. Secondary endpoints included immunogenicity and safety over 6 months post-vaccination. RESULTS: GMTs were comparable between the lots meeting the acceptance criteria for equivalence. The average GMT (measured by 50% CHIKV micro plaque neutralization test; µPRNT50) peaked with 2643 at 28 days post-vaccination and decreased to 709 at 6 months post-vaccination. An excellent seroresponse rate (defined as µPRNT50 titre ≥ 150 considered protective) was achieved in 97.8% of participants at 28 days post-vaccination and still persisted in 96% at 6 months after vaccination. Upon VLA1553 immunization, 72.5% of participants experienced adverse events (AEs), without significant differences between lots (related solicited systemic AE: 53.9% of participants; related solicited local AE: 19.4%). Overall, AEs were mostly mild or moderate and resolved without sequela, usually within 3 days. With 3.9% of participants experiencing severe AEs, 2.7% were classified as related, whereas none of the six reported serious adverse events was related to the administration of VLA1553. CONCLUSIONS: All three lots of VLA1553 recapitulated the safety and immunogenicity profiles of a preceding Phase 3 study, fulfilling pre-defined consistency requirements. These results highlight the manufacturability of VLA1553, a promising vaccine for the prevention of CHIKV disease for those living in or travelling to endemic areas.

Safety and immunogenicity against ancestral, Delta and Omicron virus variants following a booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001): Interim analysis of an open-label extension of the randomized, controlled, phase 3 COV-COMPARE trial.

OBJECTIVES: Booster doses for COVID-19 vaccinations have been shown to amplify the waning immune response after primary vaccination and to enhance protection against emerging variants of concern (VoCs). Here, we aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) after primary vaccination with 2 doses of either VLA2001 or ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-Astra Zeneca), including the cross-neutralization capacity against the Delta and Omicron VoCs. METHODS: This interim analysis of an open-label extension of a randomized, controlled phase 3 trial assessed a single booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) in healthy or medically stable adults aged 18 years and above, recruited in 21 clinical sites in the UK, who had previously received two doses of either VLA2001 or ChAdOx1-S. Safety outcomes were frequency and severity of solicited injection site and systemic reactions within 7 days after booster vaccination as well as frequency and severity of any unsolicited adverse events (AE) after up to 6 months. Immunogenicity outcomes were the immune response to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 assessed 14 days post booster expressed as geometric mean titres (GMT), GMT fold ratios and seroconversion of specific neutralizing antibodies and S-protein binding IgG antibodies. Immunogenicity against the Delta and Omicron VoCs was assessed as a post-hoc outcome with a pseudovirus neutralization antibody assay. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04864561, and is ongoing. RESULTS: A booster dose of VLA2001 was administered to 958 participants, of whom 712 had been primed with VLA2001, and 246 with ChAdOx1-S. Within 7 days following these booster doses, 607 (63.4%) participants reported solicited injection site reactions, and 487 (50.8%) reported solicited systemic reactions. Up to 14 days post booster, 751 (78.4%) participants reported at least one adverse event. The tolerability profile of a booster dose of VLA2001 was similar in VLA2001-primed and ChAdOx1-S-primed participants. In VLA2001-primed participants, the GMT (95% CI) of neutralizing antibodies increased from 32.5 (22.8, 46.3) immediately before to 521.5 (413.0, 658.6) 2 weeks after administration of the booster dose, this corresponds to a geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of 27.7 (20.0, 38.5). Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMFR was 3.6 (2.8, 4.7). In the ChAdOx1-S primed group, the GMT (95% CI) of neutralizing antibodies increased from 65.8 (43.9, 98.4) immediately before to 188.3 (140.3, 252.8) 2 weeks after administration of the booster dose, a geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of 3.0 (2.2, 4.0). Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMFR was 1.6 (1.1, 2.2). For S-protein binding IgG antibodies, the pre- versus post-booster GMT fold ratio (95% CI) was 34.6 (25.0, 48.0) in the VLA2001-primed group and 4.0 (3.0, 5.2) in the ChAdOx1-S-primed group. Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMT fold rise of IgG antibodies was 3.8 (3.2, 4.6) in the VLA2001-primed group and 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) in the ChAdOx1-S-primed group. The GMT against Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.4/5) increased from 4.2 to 260, and from 2.7 to 56.7, respectively, when boosting subjects previously primed with VLA2001. Following the boost, 97% of subjects primed with VLA2001 had detectable Delta- and 94% Omicron-neutralizing antibodies. In subjects primed with ChAdOx1-S, the GMT against Delta and Omicron titres increased from 9.1 to 92.5, and from 3.6 to 12.3, respectively. After boosting, 99% of subjects primed with ChAdOx1-S had detectable Delta- and 70% Omicron-neutralizing antibodies. In both VLA2001 and ChAdOx1-S primed subjects, the additional VLA2001 dose boosted T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 antigens to levels above those observed before the booster dose. CONCLUSION: A booster dose of VLA2001 was safe and well tolerated after primary immunization with VLA2001 and ChAdOx1-S. The tolerability of a booster dose of VLA2001 was similar to the favourable profile observed after the first and second priming doses. Both in a homologous and a heterologous setting, boosting resulted in higher neutralizing antibody titres than after primary immunization and significant increases in cross-neutralization titres against Delta and Omicron were observed after the booster dose. These data support the use of VLA2001 in booster programmes in ChadOx1-S primed groups.

Safety and immunogenicity of a novel multivalent OspA-based vaccine candidate against Lyme borreliosis: a randomised, phase 1 study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis, potentially associated with serious long-term complications, is caused by the species complex Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. We investigated a novel Lyme borreliosis vaccine candidate (VLA15) targeting the six most common outer surface protein A (OspA) serotypes 1-6 to prevent infection with pathogenic Borrelia spp prevalent in Europe and North America. METHODS: This was a partially randomised, observer-masked, phase 1 study in healthy adults older than 18 years to younger than 40 years (n=179) done in trial sites in Belgium and the USA. Following a non-randomised run-in phase, a sealed envelope randomisation method was applied with a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio; three dose concentrations of VLA15 (12 µg, 48 µg, and 90 µg) were administered by intramuscular injection on days 1, 29, and 57. The primary outcome was safety (frequency of adverse events up to day 85) assessed in participants who received at least one vaccination. Immunogenicity was a secondary outcome. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03010228, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Jan 23, 2017 and Jan 16, 2019, of 254 participants screened for eligibility, 179 were randomly assigned into six groups: alum-adjuvanted 12 µg (n=29), 48 µg (n=31), or 90 µg (n=31) and non-adjuvanted 12 µg (n=29 participants), 48 µg (n=29), or 90 µg (n=30). VLA15 was safe and well tolerated and the majority of adverse events were mild or moderate. Overall, adverse events were more frequent in the 48 µg and 90 µg groups (range 28-30 participants [94-97%]) when compared with the 12 µg group (25 [86%] participants, 95% CI 69·4-94·5) for adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted groups. Common local reactions were tenderness (151 [84%] participants; 356 events, 95% CI 78·3-89·4) and injection site pain (120 [67%]; 224 events, 59·9-73·5); most frequent systemic reactions were headache (80 [45%]; 112 events, 37·6-52·0), excessive fatigue (45 [25%]; 56 events, 19·4-32·0), and myalgia (45 [25%]; 57 events, 19·4-32·0). A similar safety and tolerability profile was observed between adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted formulations. The majority of solicited adverse events were mild or moderate. VLA15 was immunogenic for all OspA serotypes with higher immune responses induced in the adjuvanted higher dose groups (geometric mean titre range 90 µg with alum 61·3 U/mL-321·7 U/mL vs 23·8 U/mL-111·5 U/mL at 90 µg without alum). INTERPRETATION: This novel multivalent vaccine candidate against Lyme borreliosis was safe and immunogenic and paves the way to further clinical development. FUNDING: Valneva Austria.

Safety and immunogenicity of a single-shot live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine: a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: VLA1553 is a live-attenuated vaccine candidate for active immunisation and prevention of disease caused by chikungunya virus. We report safety and immunogenicity data up to day 180 after vaccination with VLA1553. METHODS: This double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial was done in 43 professional vaccine trial sites in the USA. Eligible participants were healthy volunteers aged 18 years and older. Patients were excluded if they had history of chikungunya virus infection or immune-mediated or chronic arthritis or arthralgia, known or suspected defect of the immune system, any inactivated vaccine received within 2 weeks before vaccination with VLA1553, or any live vaccine received within 4 weeks before vaccination with VLA1553. Participants were randomised (3:1) to receive VLA1553 or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of baseline negative participants with a seroprotective chikungunya virus antibody level defined as 50% plaque reduction in a micro plaque reduction neutralisation test (µPRNT) with a µPRNT50 titre of at least 150, 28 days after vaccination. The safety analysis included all individuals who received vaccination. Immunogenicity analyses were done in a subset of participants at 12 pre-selected study sites. These participants were required to have no major protocol deviations to be included in the per-protocol population for immunogenicity analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04546724. FINDINGS: Between Sept 17, 2020 and April 10, 2021, 6100 people were screened for eligibility. 1972 people were excluded and 4128 participants were enrolled and randomised (3093 to VLA1553 and 1035 to placebo). 358 participants in the VLA1553 group and 133 participants in the placebo group discontinued before trial end. The per-protocol population for immunogenicity analysis comprised 362 participants (266 in the VLA1553 group and 96 in the placebo group). After a single vaccination, VLA1553 induced seroprotective chikungunya virus neutralising antibody levels in 263 (98·9%) of 266 participants in the VLA1553 group (95% CI 96·7-99·8; p<0·0001) 28 days post-vaccination, independent of age. VLA1553 was generally safe with an adverse event profile similar to other licensed vaccines and equally well tolerated in younger and older adults. Serious adverse events were reported in 46 (1·5%) of 3082 participants exposed to VLA1553 and eight (0·8%) of 1033 participants in the placebo arm. Only two serious adverse events were considered related to VLA1553 treatment (one mild myalgia and one syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion). Both participants recovered fully. INTERPRETATION: The strong immune response and the generation of seroprotective titres in almost all vaccinated participants suggests that VLA1553 is an excellent candidate for the prevention of disease caused by chikungunya virus. FUNDING: Valneva, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation, and EU Horizon 2020.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded phase 1 study investigating a novel inactivated, Vero cell-culture derived Zika virus vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) is an emerging public health threat, rendering development of a safe and effective vaccine against the virus a high priority to face this unmet medical need. Our vaccine candidate has been developed on the same platform used for the licensed vaccine IXIARO®, a vaccine against Japanese Encephalitis virus, another closely related member of the Flaviviridae family. METHODS: Between February 24, 2018 and November 16, 2018, we conducted a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo controlled, single center phase 1 study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted, inactivated, purified whole-virus Zika vaccine candidate in the U.S. A total of 67 healthy flavivirus-naïve adults aged 18 to 49 years were randomly assigned to one of five study arms to receive two immunizations of either high dose or low dose (6 antigen units or 3 antigen units) with both dose levels applied in two different immunization regimens or placebo as control. RESULTS: Our vaccine candidate showed an excellent safety profile independent of dose and vaccination regimen with predominantly mild adverse events. No serious adverse event has been reported. The ZIKV vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies in all tested doses and regimens with seroconversion rates up to 85.7% (high dose), which remained up to 40% (high dose) at 6 months follow-up. Of note, the rapid regimen triggered a substantial immune response within days. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid development and production of a ZIKV vaccine candidate building on a commercial Vero-cell manufacturing platform resulted in a safe and immunogenic vaccine suitable for further clinical development. To optimize antibody persistence, higher doses and a booster administration might be considered.

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) compared with the adenoviral vector vaccine ChAdOx1-S in adults in the UK (COV-COMPARE): interim analysis of a randomised, controlled, phase 3, immunobridging trial.

BACKGROUND: The Valneva COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001; Valneva Austria, Vienna, Austria) is an inactivated whole-virus, adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of primary vaccination with VLA2001 versus the ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-AstraZeneca) adenoviral-vectored vaccine. METHODS: In this immunobridging phase 3 trial (COV-COMPARE), participants aged 18 years and older who were medically stable (as determined by an investigator) were enrolled at 26 sites in the UK. In the double-blind, randomised, controlled arm of the trial, participants aged 30 years and older were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive two doses of VLA2001 (0·5 mL; with 33 antigen units [AU] per dose) or ChAdOx1-S (0·5 mL; with 2·5 × 108 infectious units per dose) on days 1 and 29. In another arm, participants aged 18-29 years received two doses of VLA2001 (same dose) open label on days 1 and 29. The primary immunogenicity outcome was the immune response of a two-dose schedule of VLA2001 on day 43, in adults aged 30 years and older, versus two doses of ChAdOx1-S via superiority of geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising antibodies (GMT ratio of >1 at a two-sided significance level of 5%) and non-inferiority of the seroconversion rate (non-inferiority margin of -10% for the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference between groups). The primary safety outcome was the frequency and severity of any adverse events in all participants up to day 43. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine. GMTs were assessed in a subset of participants aged 30 years and older who were seronegative at baseline, had at least one evaluable antibody titre measurement after vaccination, and had no confirmed COVID-19 during the study (immunogenicity population); and seroconversion was assessed in the per-protocol population, which comprised the immunogenicity population but excluding any participants with major protocol violations. For each timepoint, only participants with available data were included in the analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04864561, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between April 28 and June 3, 2021, 4181 individuals were screened and 4017 enrolled, of whom 2975 (74%) were aged 30 years or older and randomly assigned to receive VLA2001 (n=1978) or ChAdOx1-S (n=997), and 1042 (26%) were aged 18-29 years (all received open-label VLA2001). 4012 participants received at least one dose of vaccine (1040 in the open-label VLA2001 group, 1977 in the randomised VLA2001 group, and 995 in the ChAdOx1-S group). The immunogenicity population comprised 492 participants in the randomised VLA2001 group and 498 in the ChAdOx1-S group; three participants in the VLA2001 group were excluded from the per-protocol population. VLA2001 induced higher neutralising GMTs than did ChAdOx1-S (803·5 [95% CI 748·5-862·6] vs 576·6 [543·6-611·7]; GMT ratio 1·39 [95% CI 1·25-1·56]; p<0·0001), and non-inferior seroconversion rates (444 [97·4%] of 456 participants vs 444 [98·9%] of 449; difference -1·5% [95% CI -3·3 to 0·2]. Any adverse event was reported in 963 (92·6%) participants in the open-label VLA2001 group, 1755 (88·8%) in the randomised VLA2001 group, and 976 (98·1%) in the ChAdOx1-S group. Most adverse events reported were mild or moderate in severity. INTERPRETATION: VLA2001 has a favourable tolerability profile and met superiority criteria for neutralising antibodies and non-inferiority criterion for seroconversion rates compared with ChAdOx1-S. The data presented here formed the basis of successful marketing approval for use of VLA2001 in primary vaccination in the EU, the UK, Bahrain, and United Arab Emirates. FUNDING: UK Department of Health and Social Care and Valneva Austria.

Safety and immunogenicity of the inactivated whole-virus adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine VLA2001: A randomized, dose escalation, double-blind phase 1/2 clinical trial in healthy adults.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the safety and optimal dose of a novel inactivated whole-virus adjuvanted vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: VLA2001. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, dose-escalation study followed by a double-blind randomized trial using low, medium and high doses of VLA2001 (1:1:1). The primary safety outcome was the frequency and severity of solicited local and systemic reactions within 7 days after vaccination. The primary immunogenicity outcome was the geometric mean titre (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 two weeks after the second vaccination. The study is registered as NCT04671017. RESULTS: Between December 16, 2020, and June 3, 2021, 153 healthy adults aged 18-55 years were recruited in the UK. Overall, 81.7% of the participants reported a solicited AE, with injection site tenderness (58.2%) and headache (46.4%) being the most frequent. Only 2 participants reported a severe solicited event. Up to day 106, 131 (85.6%) participants had reported any AE. All observed incidents were transient and non-life threatening in nature. Immunogenicity measured at 2 weeks after completion of the two-dose priming schedule, showed significantly higher GMTs of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titres in the highest dose group (GMT 545.6; 95% CI: 428.1, 695.4) which were similar to a panel of convalescent sera (GMT 526.9; 95% CI: 336.5, 825.1). Seroconversion rates of neutralizing antibodies were also significantly higher in the high-dose group (>90%) compared to the other dose groups. In the high dose group, antigen-specific IFN-γ expressing T-cells reactive against the S, M and N proteins were observed in 76, 36 and 49%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VLA2001 was well tolerated in all tested dose groups, and no safety signal of concern was identified. The highest dose group showed statistically significantly stronger immunogenicity with similar tolerability and safety, and was selected for phase 3 clinical development.

Effectiveness of CHIKV vaccine VLA1553 demonstrated by passive transfer of human sera.

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a reemerging mosquito-borne alphavirus responsible for numerous outbreaks. Chikungunya can cause debilitating acute and chronic disease. Thus, the development of a safe and effective CHIKV vaccine is an urgent global health priority. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine VLA1553 against WT CHIKV infection by using passive transfer of sera from vaccinated volunteers to nonhuman primates (NHP) subsequently exposed to WT CHIKV and established a serological surrogate of protection. We demonstrated that human VLA1553 sera transferred to NHPs conferred complete protection from CHIKV viremia and fever after challenge with homologous WT CHIKV. In addition, serum transfer protected animals from other CHIKV-associated clinical symptoms and from CHIKV persistence in tissue. Based on this passive transfer study, a 50% micro-plaque reduction neutralization test titer of ≥ 150 was determined as a surrogate of protection, which was supported by analysis of samples from a seroepidemiological study. In conclusion, considering the unfeasibility of an efficacy trial due to the unpredictability and explosive, rapidly moving nature of chikungunya outbreaks, the definition of a surrogate of protection for VLA1553 is an important step toward vaccine licensure to reduce the medical burden caused by chikungunya.

Single-shot live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine in healthy adults: a phase 1, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chikungunya disease, which results in incapacitating arthralgia, has been reported worldwide. We developed a live-attenuated chikungunya virus (CHIKV) vaccine candidate designed for active immunisation of the general population living in endemic regions, as well as serving as a prophylactic measure for travellers to endemic areas. METHODS: This single-blind, randomised, dose-escalation, phase 1 study investigated as primary outcome safety of a live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine candidate. At two professional clinical trial centres in Illinois and Alabama, USA, healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years were randomly assigned (1:1:2) to one of three escalating dose groups (low dose 3·2 × 103 per 0·1 mL; medium dose 3·2 × 104 per 1 mL; or high dose 3·2 × 105 50% tissue culture infection dose per 1 mL) and received a single-shot immunisation on day 0. Individuals in all groups were revaccinated with the highest dose on either month 6 or 12, and followed up for 28 days after revaccination. The safety analysis included all individuals who received the single vaccination; the immunogenicity analysis, which was a secondary outcome, included all individuals who completed the study without major protocol deviations (per-protocol population). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03382964, and is complete. FINDINGS: The study was done between March 5, 2018, and Jul 23, 2019, with 120 adults recruited and enrolled between March 5 and June 21, 2018, and assigned to receive a low (n=31), medium (n=30), or high (n=59) dose of the vaccine. The vaccine was safe in the high-dose group and well tolerated in the low-dose and medium-dose groups. Four (7%) of 59 vaccinees in the high-dose group reported any local reaction, and 11 (36%), 12 (40%), and 40 (68%) volunteers in the low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively, reported any solicited systemic reaction. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Data up to month 12 after a single immunisation of the 120 healthy volunteers showed a good immunogenicity profile with 100% seroconversion rates achieved at day 14 (103 [100%] of 103) and sustained for 1 year across all dose groups. Mean peak antibody titres at day 28 ranged from 592·6 to 686·9 geometric mean titres from the low-dose to high-dose groups, respectively. A single vaccination was sufficient to induce sustaining high-titre neutralising antibodies, as shown by the absence of an anamnestic response after any revaccination ranging from 94% to 100% of participants. Following revaccination, vaccinees were protected from vaccine-induced viraemia. INTERPRETATION: A novel live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in an adult population and could be an effective intervention for prophylaxis of chikungunya disease worldwide. FUNDING: Valneva, Vienna, Austria; Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation and EU Horizon 2020.

A randomized placebo-controlled phase II study of a Pseudomonas vaccine in ventilated ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no vaccine against Pseudomonas is available. IC43 is a new, recombinant, protein (OprF/I)-based vaccine against the opportunistic pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a major cause of serious hospital-acquired infections. IC43 has proven immunogenicity and tolerability in healthy volunteers, patients with burns, and patients with chronic lung diseases. In order to assess the immunogenicity and safety of IC43 in patients who are most at risk of acquiring Pseudomonas infections, it was evaluated in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, partially blinded study in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. The immunogenicity of IC43 at day 14 was determined as the primary endpoint, and safety, efficacy against P. aeruginosa infections, and all-cause mortality were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Vaccinations (100 µg or 200 µg IC43 with adjuvant, or 100 µg IC43 without adjuvant, or placebo) were given twice in a 7-day interval and patients were followed up for 90 days. RESULTS: Higher OprF/I IgG antibody titers were seen at day 14 for all IC43 groups versus placebo (P < 0.0001). Seroconversion (≥4-fold increase in OprF/I IgG titer from days 0 to 14) was highest with 100 µg IC43 without adjuvant (80.6%). There were no significant differences in P. aeruginosa infection rates, with a low rate of invasive infections (pneumonia or bacteremia) in the IC43 groups (11.2-14.0%). Serious adverse events (SAEs) considered possibly related to therapy were reported by 2 patients (1.9%) in the group of 100 µg IC43 with adjuvant. Both SAEs resolved and no deaths were related to study treatment. Local tolerability symptoms were mild and rare (<5% of patients), a low rate of treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (3.1-10.6%) was observed in the IC43 groups. CONCLUSION: This phase II study has shown that IC43 vaccination of ventilated ICU patients produced a significant immunogenic effect. P. aeruginosa infection rates did not differ significantly between groups. In the absence of any difference in immune response following administration of 100 µg IC43 without adjuvant compared with 200 µg IC43 with adjuvant, the 100 µg dose without adjuvant was considered for further testing of its possible benefit of improved outcomes. There were no safety or mortality concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00876252 . Registered on 3 April 2009.

Safety, immunogenicity and dose response of VLA84, a new vaccine candidate against Clostridium difficile, in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and colitis and the most common pathogen of health care-associated infections. In the US, CDI causes approximately half a million infections and close to 30,000 deaths. Despite antibiotic treatment of C. difficile associated diarrhoea, the disease is complicated by its recurrence in up to 30% of patients. METHODS: An open-label, partially randomized, dose-escalation Phase I trial was performed in two parts. Sixty volunteers aged ≥18 to <65 years were randomized into five treatment groups to receive three immunizations (Day 0, 7, 21) of VLA84 (20µg with Alum, 75µg with or without Alum, 200µg with or without Alum). Eighty-one volunteers aged ≥65 were randomized into four treatment groups (75µg with or without Alum, 200µg with or without Alum) and received four immunizations (Day 0, 7, 28 and 56). All subjects were followed for safety and immunogenicity for six months. RESULTS: VLA84 was safe and well tolerated. Fifty-one adult volunteers (85%) and 50 elderly (62%) experienced at least one solicited or unsolicited adverse event (AE). Forty-eight adult volunteers (80%) and 40 elderly (49%) experienced related AEs which were mostly mild or moderate. No related serious adverse event and no death occurred. The vaccine induced high antibody titres against Toxin A and Toxin B in both study populations. CONCLUSION: VLA84 was safe, well tolerated and highly immunogenic in adult volunteers aged ≥18 to <65 years and elderly volunteers aged ≥65 years. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT01296386.

A randomized, placebo-controlled phase I study assessing the safety and immunogenicity of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa hybrid outer membrane protein OprF/I vaccine (IC43) in healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: IC43 is a recombinant outer membrane protein-based vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) consisting of OprF- and OprI- epitopes (Opr, outer membrane protein; OprF/I, OprF/OprI hybrid vaccine) with an N-terminal His 6 tag (Met-Ala-(His)6-OprF190-342-OprI21-83). OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to confirm the optimal dose of IC43 in adults with regard to immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability after vaccination with three different dosages of IC43, compared with placebo, and to investigate a potential immune-enhancing effect of the adjuvant, aluminum hydroxide. Subjects were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio to one of five treatment groups: 50, 100, or 200 µg IC43 with adjuvant, 100 µg IC43 without adjuvant, or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) and two intramuscular injections were given in the deltoid region 7 d apart. RESULTS: The primary immunogenicity analysis of OprF/I-specific IgG antibody titers on day 14 demonstrated statistically significant differences among treatment groups (P<0.0001), with a significantly higher immune response detected in each IC43 treatment group compared with placebo. From day 0 to day 14, a ≥4-fold increase in OprF/I-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titers were observed in>90% of subjects in all IC43 treatment groups in the per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) populations; a ≥50-fold titer increase was observed in 42.6% subjects including all IC43 treatment groups. On day 90, OprF/I-specific IgGs started to decline in all IC43 treatment groups but remained significantly higher until 6 mo compared with placebo. Assessment of functional antibody induction by opsonophagocytic assay (OPA) followed a similar pattern compared with OprF/I-specific IgG kinetics. At day 14, a ≥2-fold increase in OPA titer was observed in 54.5% subjects within all IC43 treatment groups. An increase in antibody avidity index was observed after the second vaccination. At day 14, >96% of subjects in each IC43 treatment group had detectable OprF/I-specific IgG antibodies. Anti-histidine IgG antibody titers peaked on day 14 and were reduced on day 90 in all IC43 treatment groups. OprF/I-specific IgG secreted by antibody-secreting cell (ASC) was detected in all IC43 groups by B-cell ELIspot after the second vaccination and up to 6 mo. All vaccinations were safe and well tolerated up to the maximum cumulative dosage of 400 µg IC43. CONCLUSION: IC43 doses equal to or greater than 50 µg were sufficient to induce a plateau of IgG antibody responses in healthy volunteers. Higher doses, whether adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted, were not more effective. METHODS: In this phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, multicenter clinical trial, 163 healthy volunteers (18-65 y) were randomly assigned to five treatment groups (1:1:1:1:1). Three groups received IC43 with adjuvant: 50 µg (n=32), 100 µg (n=33), or 200 µg (n=33). One group received IC43 100 µg without adjuvant (n=32), and one group received placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) (n=33). Each subject received two intramuscular vaccinations, separated by a 7-d interval (days 0 and 7) (Fig. 1). Humoral immune response was assessed by measurement of outer membrane protein F/I (OprF/I)-specific antibodies determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), anti-histidine antibodies determined by ELISA, and functional antibody activity determined by opsonophagocytic assay (OPA), up to 6 mo post-vaccination. Antibody avidity was measured on days 7 and 14 from samples that had detectable vaccine antibody-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titers. At the Austrian site only, the B-cell ELIspot assay was used to determine specific ASC responses. Safety was assessed using adverse event monitoring and clinical laboratory tests. Local and systemic tolerability was recorded in a subject diary for 7 d after each vaccination and by investigators up to 6 mo post-vaccination.

Murine gammaherpesvirus-68 productively infects immature dendritic cells and blocks maturation.

Many viruses have evolved mechanisms to evade host immunity by subverting the function of dendritic cells (DCs). This study determined whether murine gammaherpesvirus-68 (gamma HV-68) could infect immature or mature bone-marrow-derived DCs and what effect infection had on DC maturation. It was found that gamma HV-68 productively infected immature DCs, as evidenced by increased viral titres over time. If DCs were induced to mature by exposure to LPS and then infected with gamma HV-68, only a small percentage of cells was productively infected. However, limiting-dilution assays to measure viral reactivation demonstrated that the mature DCs were latently infected with gamma HV-68. Electron microscopy revealed the presence of capsids in the nucleus of immature DCs but not in mature DCs. Interestingly, infection of immature DCs by gamma HV-68 did not result in upregulation of the co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 or MHC class I and II, or induce cell migration, suggesting that the virus infection did not induce DC maturation. Furthermore, gamma HV-68 infection of immature DCs did not result in elevated interleukin-12, an important cytokine in the induction of T-cell responses. Finally, lipopolysaccharide and poly(I : C) stimulation of gamma HV-68-infected immature DCs did not induce increases in the expression of co-stimulatory molecules and MHC class I or II compared with mock-treated cells, suggesting that gamma HV-68 infection blocked maturation. Taken together, these data demonstrate that gamma HV-68 infection of DCs differs depending on the maturation state of the DC. Moreover, the block in DC maturation suggests a possible immunoevasion strategy by gamma HV-68.

Design of protective and therapeutic DNA vaccines for the treatment of allergic diseases.

The DNA vaccine revolution has opened a vast scope of novel approaches for protective and therapeutic treatments of type I allergy. This review gives an overview on the current status of allergy DNA vaccines and presents advances in the design of vaccine constructs. An immense number of concurring studies have proven the stimulation of Th1 cells and the induction of a balanced Th1/Th2 cytokine milieu as the fundamental mechanisms underlying the anti-allergic effects of DNA vaccines. Basic vaccine formulations thus can be optimized by improving the cellular immunogenicity via co-administration of cytokines, co-expression or co-application of immunostimulatory DNA sequences or adapting the codon usage. The latter is a frequent and major reason for impaired vaccine expression (e.g. translation of plant allergen genes in mammal cells). Because of unwanted side effects during conventional specific immunotherapy with allergen extracts, safety is increasingly demanded for both, protein and DNA vaccines for allergy treatment. We discuss the creation of hypoallergenic DNA vaccines based on deliberate allergen gene fragmentation, the use of mutations and the routine production of hypoallergenic DNA vaccines by forced ubiquitination. Furthermore, allergen-expressing DNA replicon vaccines are introduced, which enable a drastic reduction of the vaccine dose without loss of anti-allergic efficacy. Finally, the development of DNA multi vaccines and fusion vaccines for protective and therapeutic applications against certain groups of allergens is addressed.

DNA vaccines for allergy treatment.

In the past 10 years, a great number of studies have demonstrated that injection of plasmid DNA coding for certain genes results in the induction of humoral and cellular immune responses against the respective gene product. This vaccination approach covers a broad range of possible applications, including the induction of protective immunity against viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections, and it opens new perspectives for treatment of cancer. Surprisingly, DNA immunization also turned out as a promising novel type of immunotherapy against allergy. In this paper, we describe the construction of DNA vaccines for application in allergy models. Beyond, we offer a palette of recently developed modulations to optimize DNA vaccines for allergy treatment by increasing their immunogenicity and minimizing their anaphylactic potential.

Mucosal co-application of lactic acid bacteria and allergen induces counter-regulatory immune responses in a murine model of birch pollen allergy.

Recent epidemiological studies and clinical trials suggest a possible role of certain lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains in the prevention of allergic diseases. In this study, we aimed at evaluating the immunomodulatory potential of two LAB strains, Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum, for prophylaxis and therapy of allergic immune responses. Both LAB strains-induced high levels of IL-12 and IFN-gamma in naive murine spleen cell cultures. Intranasal co-application with recombinant Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, prior or after allergic sensitization, led to increased levels of allergen-specific IgG2a antibodies and in vitro IFN-gamma production, indicating a shift towards Th1 responses. Successful immunomodulation by the mucosal pre-treatment was further demonstrated by suppression of allergen-induced basophil degranulation. We conclude that these LAB strains in combination with an allergen could be promising candidates for mucosal vaccination against type I allergy.

TH1-promoting DNA immunization against allergens modulates the ratio of IgG1/IgG2a but does not affect the anaphylactic potential of IgG1 antibodies: no evidence for the synthesis of nonanaphylactic IgG1.

BACKGROUND: In mouse, IgG1 has been reported to make up 2 functionally distinct phenotypes that also differ in their induction requirements. One of these phenotypes lacks anaphylactic activity. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that nonanaphylactic IgG1 could modulate allergic reactions and investigated whether such antibodies are induced by DNA immunization. METHODS: Mice were immunized with allergen-encoding plasmid DNA or with recombinant allergens and alum. Sera were analyzed for IgG subclasses by ELISA for anaphylactic IgE by rat basophil degranulation, and after heat inactivation of IgE for anaphylactic IgG by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis assay. IFN-gamma and IL-5 from in-vitro restimulated spleen cells were quantitated by ELISA. RESULTS: After protein immunization, mice produced IgG1 and IgE, whereas DNA immunization elicited IgG1 and IgG2a but no IgE. However, all sera were positive for non-IgE-mediated passive cutaneous anaphylaxis. In the presence of anaphylactic IgG1, the additional occurrence of nonanaphylactic IgG1 cannot be strictly ruled out. To circumvent this problem, we immunized IL-4 receptor-deficient mice against Bet v 1a, because anaphylactic but not nonanaphylactic IgG1 has been reported to depend on IL-4. These animals produced only low amounts of IgG1, but sera were again positive for non-IgE-mediated anaphylactic activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed no evidence for the production of nonanaphylactic IgG1. Furthermore, our data indicate that the development of non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis does not require IL-4 receptor signaling.

Prevention of allergen-specific IgE production and suppression of an established Th2-type response by immunization with DNA encoding hypoallergenic allergen derivatives of Bet v 1, the major birch-pollen allergen.

In atopic patients, programming towards a preferential Th2 immunity leads to IgE antibody production and cellular Th2 immunity against otherwise harmless antigens. We report the development of prophylactic and therapeutic DNA vaccines for the major birch-pollen allergen, Bet v 1. We constructed three DNA vaccines, coding for the complete cDNA, coding for two hypoallergenic fragments or coding for a hypoallergenic Bet v 1 mutant. The protective effect was studied in mice pretreated by intradermal DNA injections, then sensitized with Bet v 1 protein. Mice pretreated with any of the three Bet v 1-specific DNA vaccines were protected against allergic sensitization to Bet v 1. Protection was characterized by a lack of Bet v 1-specific IgE production, a lack of basophil activation and an enhanced IFN-gamma expression. DNA vaccines with wild-type Bet v 1 induced strong Bet v 1-specific antibody responses whereas DNA vaccines with hypoallergenic Bet v 1 derivatives induced no (fragments) or only transient (mutant) Bet v 1-specific antibody responses. A therapeutic approach with the fragment-DNA vaccine reduced IgE production and stimulated a sustained Th1 cytokine milieu. Our results demonstrate that DNA vaccines with hypoallergenic forms of the allergen specifically protect against sensitization and suppress established Th2-type responses. This concept may be applied for the development of safe and specific DNA vaccines for the prophylaxis and therapy of allergic diseases.

Strategies for the development of safe and effective DNA vaccines for allergy treatment.

During the past ten years, a great number of studies have demonstrated that injection of plasmid DNA coding for certain genes results in the induction of humoral and cellular immune responses against the respective gene product. The features of DNA vaccines enable a broad range of applications, including the induction of protective immunity against viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections, and open up new perspectives for the treatment of cancer. Furthermore, based on their Th1-promoting properties, DNA vaccines also turned out to balance Th2-mediated immune reactions, a quality which renders them a promising alternative for immunotherapy against allergy. Their unique immunological properties offer new possibilities for the development of vaccines, which do not cause anaphylactic side effects, a major drawback of specific immunotherapy (SIT). In this review, we present approaches to avoid the translation of native allergenic determinants, thus preventing release of allergy mediators stimulated by crosslinking of pre-existing or vaccine-induced IgE antibodies on mast cells. Three approaches are described, which fulfill these requirements: (i) cutting the allergen gene into overlapping fragments, which lack any antigenic determinant of the native allergen, but display the original repertoire of T cell epitopes, (ii) using hypoallergenic derivatives or (iii) fusing the allergen with ubiquitin, thus fragmenting the antigen and destroying its native structure. The presented experiments demonstrate that DNA vaccines are suitable to balance an allergic response in a protective as well as a therapeutic experimental design, thus demonstrating their potential for allergy treatment. In addition to conventional plasmid DNA vaccines, aspects and perspectives of replicon-based DNA vaccines will be discussed.

Quantification of histamine in blood plasma and cell culture supernatants: a validated one-step gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method.

A novel one-step ethylchloroformate (ECF) derivatization of histamine in biological liquid matrices that allows the sensitive quantification by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopic detection (GC-MS) from small volumes of blood plasma or cell culture supernatants within 15 min is described. After addition of ECF/chloroform directly to the crude sample, histamine has been found to be quantitatively derivatized within seconds. Following centrifugation, the organic phase is transferred to a fresh vial, dried by addition of anhydrous sodium sulfate, and subjected to GC-MS analysis. The reliability of the results is verified by use of two different ion pairs for detection. The method is validated according to DIN 38402. Linearity is given from 0.0054 to 13 microg/ml and the limit of detection is 2 ng/ml (10 pg absolute, at a signal to noise ratio of 3:1). The limit of quantification, as calculated at a confidence level of 95%, is 15.6 ng/ml. Practical application is exemplified by the determination of the histamine content in blood plasma of birch pollen-sensitized mice and in the culture supernatant of rat basophil leukemia cells after Ca(2+) ionophore-mediated degranulation.